Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sunmax Products Inc. is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very focused and limited prosecution profile at the present time. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit for the pending work confirms that the company's current legal efforts are not spread across multiple technical divisions.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is NGUYEN, TUAN N, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the entire pending workload for the company's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering filings is concentrated under this single individual's review. This represents the full extent of the company's current active matters at the patent office. The matter assigned to NGUYEN, TUAN N constitutes the entirety of the company's active prosecution pipeline.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, TUAN N | 1 | 68.1% | +26.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18917459 | EXPANDABLE ANCHOR BOLT SYSTEM AND TOILET INSTALLATION METHOD | NGUYEN, TUAN N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18917459 | EXPANDABLE ANCHOR BOLT SYSTEM AND TOILET INSTALLATION METHOD | NGUYEN, TUAN N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18917459 | EXPANDABLE ANCHOR BOLT SYSTEM AND TOILET INSTALLATION METHOD | NGUYEN, TUAN N | 3754 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial