Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sunnybrook Research Institute

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sunnybrook Research Institute has 8 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are distributed among 8 distinct examiners, meaning every pending case is being reviewed by a different person. This creates a diverse examination environment with no overlap in the personnel handling the current applications. The portfolio spans 7 distinct art units, reflecting a broad range of technical classifications within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

CWERN, JONATHAN is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending office action. With 8 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units, practitioners must be prepared for a fragmented prosecution process that requires individual strategies for each pending matter. The high count of 7 distinct art units suggests that the institute's technology is being evaluated against a wide array of prior art and technical standards. Counsel should treat each of the 8 pending office actions as an independent effort, as the lack of examiner overlap means that arguments successful in one case may not influence the others.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
38% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CWERN, JONATHAN 1 51.0% +33.1%
VIRK, ADIL PARTAP S 1 47.8% +43.0%
HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 1 76.7% +20.9%
POHNERT, STEVEN C 1 12.5% +18.2%
MOHAMMED, SHAHDEEP 1 51.7% +56.9%
BARRON, SEAN C 1 52.7% +30.4%
HUYNH, PHUONG N 1 65.8% +53.6%
DANG, ANH TIEU 1 65.7% +34.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18606200 CONSTRUCTS, USE AND METHODS THEREOF POHNERT, STEVEN C 14d
19147479 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING TRANSDUCER MODULES FOR GENERATING FOCUSED ULTRASOUND CWERN, JONATHAN —
19225582 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING THERMAL SKULL-INDUCED ABERRATIONS DURING TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES VIRK, ADIL PARTAP S —
18287970 T CELLS COMPRISING AN UNREARRANGED T CELL RECEPTOR (TCR) GENE LOCUS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF BARRON, SEAN C —
18029468 BISPECIFIC CONSTRUCTS FOR EXPANDING T CELLS AND RELATED METHODS HUYNH, PHUONG N —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18606200 CONSTRUCTS, USE AND METHODS THEREOF POHNERT, STEVEN C 14d
17608276 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A BALLOON CATHETER SUPPORT SLEEVE DANG, ANH TIEU 55d
19147479 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING TRANSDUCER MODULES FOR GENERATING FOCUSED ULTRASOUND CWERN, JONATHAN —
19225582 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING THERMAL SKULL-INDUCED ABERRATIONS DURING TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES VIRK, ADIL PARTAP S —
18856153 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING STAIN DECONVOLUTION HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M —
18681401 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATED TO BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER PENETRATION MOHAMMED, SHAHDEEP —
18287970 T CELLS COMPRISING AN UNREARRANGED T CELL RECEPTOR (TCR) GENE LOCUS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF BARRON, SEAN C —
18029468 BISPECIFIC CONSTRUCTS FOR EXPANDING T CELLS AND RELATED METHODS HUYNH, PHUONG N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3797 2
3798 1
2671 1
1683 1
1653 1
1641 1
3771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19147479 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING TRANSDUCER MODULES FOR GENERATING FOCUSED ULTRASOUND CWERN, JONATHAN 3797 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2025
19225582 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING THERMAL SKULL-INDUCED ABERRATIONS DURING TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES VIRK, ADIL PARTAP S 3798 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 02, 2025
18856153 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING STAIN DECONVOLUTION HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 2671 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18606200 CONSTRUCTS, USE AND METHODS THEREOF POHNERT, STEVEN C 1683 §103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Mar 15, 2024
18681401 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATED TO BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER PENETRATION MOHAMMED, SHAHDEEP 3797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2024
18287970 T CELLS COMPRISING AN UNREARRANGED T CELL RECEPTOR (TCR) GENE LOCUS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF BARRON, SEAN C 1653 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2023
18029468 BISPECIFIC CONSTRUCTS FOR EXPANDING T CELLS AND RELATED METHODS HUYNH, PHUONG N 1641 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 30, 2023
17608276 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A BALLOON CATHETER SUPPORT SLEEVE DANG, ANH TIEU 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 55d Pending Nov 02, 2021

Managing Sunnybrook Research Institute's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sunnybrook Research Institute have?

Sunnybrook Research Institute has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sunnybrook Research Institute applications?

Jonathan Cwern has the most, with 1 of Sunnybrook Research Institute's pending office actions.

What technology area are Sunnybrook Research Institute's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month