Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sunshine In Interaction

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Sunshine In Interaction currently has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners but are both located within 1 distinct art unit. This distribution indicates that while different individuals are reviewing the cases, they are both subject to the same administrative group's standards.

The busiest examiner, MANSFIELD, THOMAS L, is assigned 1 pending office action. Because there are 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions, the company must address 2 different sets of examiner expectations simultaneously. However, the use of only 1 distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field suggests that the underlying technologies are closely related.

Practitioners can benefit from this concentration by identifying common procedural trends within the 1 distinct art unit, even if the 2 distinct examiners have different personal styles. This overlap means that Sunshine In Interaction can maintain a more unified strategy for its 2 pending office actions than if they were in different art units. The small scale of the pending portfolio is balanced by its concentration within a single administrative group. This focus allows for a more efficient use of resources during the prosecution of the 2 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MANSFIELD, THOMAS L 1 51.1% +32.8%
BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE 1 22.7% +26.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19211933 ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC DIARIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF ONLINE MEETINGS MANSFIELD, THOMAS L —
19205445 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY ANALYZING ONLINE MEETING METADATA IN REAL-TIME BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19211933 ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC DIARIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF ONLINE MEETINGS MANSFIELD, THOMAS L —
19205445 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY ANALYZING ONLINE MEETING METADATA IN REAL-TIME BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3624 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19211933 ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC DIARIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF ONLINE MEETINGS MANSFIELD, THOMAS L 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 19, 2025
19205445 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY ANALYZING ONLINE MEETING METADATA IN REAL-TIME BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE 3624 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 12, 2025

Managing Sunshine In Interaction's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sunshine In Interaction have?

Sunshine In Interaction has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sunshine In Interaction applications?

Thomas L Mansfield has the most, with 1 of Sunshine In Interaction's pending office actions.

What technology area are Sunshine In Interaction's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month