Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Suomen Visor OY maintains a patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. At present, the portfolio contains 1 pending office action. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit, showing a concentrated prosecution profile.
The busiest examiner for Suomen Visor OY is RAMSEY, JEREMY C, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. The placement within 1 distinct art unit indicates that the technology being prosecuted is categorized within a specific specialty in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
The presence of 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner simplifies the current prosecution strategy. All active patent office interactions for the company are consolidated under RAMSEY, JEREMY C, requiring a focused approach to address the specific concerns raised. This concentration allows for a direct and consistent dialogue with the patent office regarding the company's mechanical systems.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 1 | 52.5% | +46.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18340149 | Blind, a glazing system for a terrace or a balcony, and a method for arranging a blind in connection with a glazing system for a terrace or a balcony | RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 92d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18340149 | Blind, a glazing system for a terrace or a balcony, and a method for arranging a blind in connection with a glazing system for a terrace or a balcony | RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 92d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3634 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18340149 | Blind, a glazing system for a terrace or a balcony, and a method for arranging a blind in connection with a glazing system for a terrace or a balcony | RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 3634 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 92d overdue | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial