Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Superior Radiant Products Ltd. is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single action represents the total active prosecution workload for the company at the USPTO. The focus on 1 pending office action indicates that the company's current legal resources are dedicated to a specific patent application rather than a broad array of filings.
The prosecution is being conducted by 1 distinct examiner, WEINERT, WILLIAM C. This individual is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, as he is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently under review. Furthermore, the matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the technical subject matter is highly specialized within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.
For a practitioner, the alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action creates a streamlined environment. There is no need to reconcile different examiner styles or art unit standards, allowing for a direct and consistent communication channel with WEINERT, WILLIAM C. This concentration of the workload ensures that the prosecution strategy remains focused on the specific requirements of a single USPTO official.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEINERT, WILLIAM C | 1 | 57.9% | +35.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18554172 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF HEATING LIVESTOCK BARNS USING MODULATING RADIANT EMITTER | WEINERT, WILLIAM C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18554172 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF HEATING LIVESTOCK BARNS USING MODULATING RADIANT EMITTER | WEINERT, WILLIAM C | 3762 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 05, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSuperior Radiant Products Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
William C Weinert has the most, with 1 of Superior Radiant Products Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
