Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Supertab AG

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Supertab AG currently has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner is SIMPSON, DIONE N, who has 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that each of the 2 pending office actions is assigned to a different individual.

The 2 distinct examiners are both working within the same 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the transportation and e-commerce filings are being reviewed by a single specialized division at the office. Managing 2 pending office actions within 1 distinct art unit allows the company to tailor its prosecution approach to the specific standards of that unit while interacting with two different officials.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIMPSON, DIONE N 1 32.6% +32.4%
MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR 1 80.0% +33.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19041258 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR AN INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A RESPONSE TO A USER QUERY SIMPSON, DIONE N 88d overdue
18952383 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR PROVIDING ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM RESPONSES TO CLIENT REQUESTS MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19041258 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR AN INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A RESPONSE TO A USER QUERY SIMPSON, DIONE N 88d overdue
18952383 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR PROVIDING ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM RESPONSES TO CLIENT REQUESTS MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3628 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19041258 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR AN INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A RESPONSE TO A USER QUERY SIMPSON, DIONE N 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection 88d overdue Pending Jan 30, 2025
18952383 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR PROVIDING ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM RESPONSES TO CLIENT REQUESTS MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2024

Managing Supertab AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month