Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Supra Medical Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. AHMED, TASNIM M is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing the 1 pending office action.
With only 1 pending office action, the company's current prosecution activity is very narrow. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner means that the success of the current active portfolio depends entirely on the interactions with AHMED, TASNIM M. Furthermore, the 1 distinct art unit indicates that the technology is focused within a specific area of medical devices. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific examination patterns of AHMED, TASNIM M, as there are no other active cases to provide alternative prosecution paths. The lack of multiple pending office actions suggests a highly targeted intellectual property strategy where each filing is of high individual importance. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action leaves no room for inconsistent examiner treatment within the current active docket. This concentrated profile requires a precise and well-prepared response to the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AHMED, TASNIM M | 1 | 81.4% | +4.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18772181 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR INJECTING MEDICATION SUBSTANCES TOWARDS A TARGET SITE IN A BODY TISSUE | AHMED, TASNIM M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18772181 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR INJECTING MEDICATION SUBSTANCES TOWARDS A TARGET SITE IN A BODY TISSUE | AHMED, TASNIM M | 3783 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSupra Medical Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Tasnim M Ahmed has the most, with 1 of Supra Medical Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
