Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Surmodics, Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Surmodics, Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. JUSTIN L ZAMORY is the busiest examiner for this entity, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. The distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests the portfolio covers varied technical aspects within the medical device field that require different specialized knowledge.

With 2 distinct examiners handling the 2 pending office actions, the company must navigate two different sets of examiner preferences. The fact that JUSTIN L ZAMORY is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action highlights that the workload is distributed across the available examiners. Practitioners should note that the 2 pending office actions are not consolidated, meaning that arguments successful in one of the 2 distinct art units may not necessarily carry weight in the other. This requires a customized approach for each of the 2 pending office actions to address the specific requirements of the assigned examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 1 70.4% +18.8%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17896589 THROMBECTOMY CAPTURE SYSTEM HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17896589 THROMBECTOMY CAPTURE SYSTEM HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 3771 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 26, 2022

Managing Surmodics, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month