Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Susmed Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DALENCOURT, YVES, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a concentrated technical review process. This concentration suggests that the applicant's current legal strategy is entirely dependent on the specific technical standards of this 1 unit within the Networking & Security field.
The busiest examiner pending count stands at 1, which accounts for the total volume of 1 pending office action. Because 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit are involved, the applicant is dealing with a singular point of contact at the patent office. This concentration suggests that the outcome of the current pending action will be determined by the specific interpretations of DALENCOURT, YVES. Practitioners should prioritize a thorough review of this examiner's previous rulings to identify common patterns in how they handle Networking & Security applications. Since there is only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patent goals are tied to the resolution of this single case. The focus on 1 distinct art unit means that the technical arguments must be precisely aligned with the specific requirements of that unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DALENCOURT, YVES | 1 | 84.2% | -5.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19116425 | TREATMENT APPLICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND TREATMENT APPLICATION PROGRAM | DALENCOURT, YVES | 22d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2457 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19116425 | TREATMENT APPLICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND TREATMENT APPLICATION PROGRAM | DALENCOURT, YVES | 2457 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Mar 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial