Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Svexa Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific focus on medical or mechanical innovations. The presence of a pending action suggests a streamlined prosecution phase for the company's current filings within this technical domain. This narrow focus allows for a highly targeted intellectual property strategy.
The portfolio involves a distinct examiner, concentrating the review process. OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC is the busiest examiner, managing the pending office action. Since this individual is responsible for the entirety of the company's pending workload, the prosecution strategy should be highly personalized to their past actions and preferences. The focus on a specific art unit and examiner simplifies the administrative oversight required for the current portfolio while making the outcome dependent on the individual's interpretation of the claims.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | 1 | 50.0% | +57.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18851212 | METHOD OF PREVENTING OVERTRAINING, OR DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF EXERCISE | OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18851212 | METHOD OF PREVENTING OVERTRAINING, OR DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF EXERCISE | OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18851212 | METHOD OF PREVENTING OVERTRAINING, OR DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF EXERCISE | OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | 3796 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial