Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Swaresh Borse currently manages a focused patent portfolio within the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio shows 1 pending office action, which represents the entirety of the current examination activity for this entity. This pending action is assigned to examiner MAUST, TROY A, who serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending case.
The prosecution footprint is concentrated, as evidenced by the presence of only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. For a practitioner, this indicates that the current legal strategy is confined to a specific niche within the Computing & Software sector. The fact that MAUST, TROY A is responsible for the pending office action suggests that the outcome of this interaction will define the immediate success of the portfolio. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the technical scope remains narrow, requiring a specialized approach to the preferences of the examiner and the specific standards of the art unit. This lack of examiner diversity means that the applicant does not have to manage conflicting requirements from different offices, allowing for a highly tailored response strategy that focuses exclusively on the precedents and tendencies of the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAUST, TROY A | 1 | 76.1% | +10.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18079871 | Smart Connector Matrix - an electrical tool to design and test circuits without maneuvering components | MAUST, TROY A | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2189 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18079871 | Smart Connector Matrix - an electrical tool to design and test circuits without maneuvering components | MAUST, TROY A | 2189 | §112 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Dec 12, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSwaresh Borse has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Troy A Maust has the most, with 1 of Swaresh Borse's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
