Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Swisca AG

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Swisca AG currently has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's mechanical innovations are being reviewed by different specialized sections of the patent office. Managing 2 pending office actions in this way requires attention to the specific nuances of 2 distinct art units.

The company's active cases are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, with PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK identified as the busiest examiner. PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK is responsible for 1 pending office action, which represents 1 of the 2 total pending office actions. This even distribution across 2 distinct examiners prevents any single individual from having a majority influence over the pending portfolio, requiring independent engagement for each case.

For practitioners, the fact that 2 pending office actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units suggests a decentralized prosecution environment. There is no busiest examiner with more than 1 pending office action, so each case must be handled independently. Success will depend on tailoring arguments to the specific preferences of PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK and the other assigned examiner to move the cases forward.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 1 59.1% +29.3%
DANG, KET D 1 61.6% +37.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18554001 WETTING DEVICE FOR CEREAL GRAIN DANG, KET D 6d
18992637 FEED DEVICE AND ROLLER FACILITY PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18554001 WETTING DEVICE FOR CEREAL GRAIN DANG, KET D 6d
18992637 FEED DEVICE AND ROLLER FACILITY PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3725 1
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18992637 FEED DEVICE AND ROLLER FACILITY PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 3725 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2025
18554001 WETTING DEVICE FOR CEREAL GRAIN DANG, KET D 3761 §103§112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Oct 05, 2023

Managing Swisca AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Swisca AG have?

Swisca AG has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Swisca AG applications?

Paul Derek Pressley has the most, with 1 of Swisca AG's pending office actions.

What technology area are Swisca AG's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month