Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Swiss Krono Tec AG

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Swiss Krono Tec AG is currently navigating 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution is notably decentralized, with the 5 actions spread across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This 1 to 1 ratio between actions, examiners, and art units indicates a broad technical footprint where each filing faces a unique set of regulatory eyes and specialized standards.

VO, ANH T N is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing 1 pending office action. This represents a small portion of the total workload, as no single examiner holds more than 1 of the 5 pending actions. The presence of 5 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations in Chemistry & Materials are diverse enough to trigger reviews from 5 different specialized divisions. For practitioners, this distribution requires managing 5 separate examiner relationships and adhering to the specific nuances of 5 different art units simultaneously. This level of diversification means that the company must be prepared for a wide variety of examiner preferences and technical interpretations across its active filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VO, ANH T N 1 90.0% +4.6%
VO, HAI 1 57.1% +72.4%
MCLEAN, NEIL R 1 79.9% +10.3%
KRUER, KEVIN R 1 26.8% +29.4%
BROWN, JARED O 1 73.9% +39.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18860317 METHOD FOR PRINTING A PAPER, AND DIGITAL PRINTING DEVICE VO, ANH T N —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18286891 BINDER COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A WOOD MATERIAL, AND WOOD MATERIAL KRUER, KEVIN R 46d overdue
18792067 STAINABLE SURFACE VO, HAI 19d
18730111 METHOD FOR PRINTING ON A PAPER WEB MCLEAN, NEIL R —
18032646 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING WOOD SHAVINGS BROWN, JARED O —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18286891 BINDER COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A WOOD MATERIAL, AND WOOD MATERIAL KRUER, KEVIN R 46d overdue
18792067 STAINABLE SURFACE VO, HAI 19d
18730111 METHOD FOR PRINTING ON A PAPER WEB MCLEAN, NEIL R —
18032646 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING WOOD SHAVINGS BROWN, JARED O —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2853 1
1788 1
2681 1
1787 1
3725 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18860317 METHOD FOR PRINTING A PAPER, AND DIGITAL PRINTING DEVICE VO, ANH T N 2853 DP Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18792067 STAINABLE SURFACE VO, HAI 1788 §102§103 Final Rejection 19d Pending Aug 01, 2024
18730111 METHOD FOR PRINTING ON A PAPER WEB MCLEAN, NEIL R 2681 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2024
18286891 BINDER COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A WOOD MATERIAL, AND WOOD MATERIAL KRUER, KEVIN R 1787 §102§103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Oct 13, 2023
18032646 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING WOOD SHAVINGS BROWN, JARED O 3725 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2023

Managing Swiss Krono Tec AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month