7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (71%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, WILLIAM Y | 3 | 48.2% | +34.0% |
| KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN | 1 | 61.8% | +29.6% |
| KENYON, JOHN S | 1 | 80.2% | +17.5% |
| TRAN, ERIC | 1 | 69.8% | +24.0% |
| SIMMONS, CHRIS E | 1 | 34.5% | +19.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17784841 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING D2O | KENYON, JOHN S | 1d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18763381 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION AND DELIVERY DEVICE THEREOF | KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17681560 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | SIMMONS, CHRIS E | 23d overdue |
| 18784718 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | LEE, WILLIAM Y | 10d overdue |
| 17721831 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | TRAN, ERIC | 8d overdue |
| 17784841 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING D2O | KENYON, JOHN S | 1d overdue |
| 17894884 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | LEE, WILLIAM Y | 55d |
| 18763381 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION AND DELIVERY DEVICE THEREOF | KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN | — |
| 17894885 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | LEE, WILLIAM Y | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1623 | 3 |
| 3781 | 1 |
| 1625 | 1 |
| 1629 | 1 |
| 1622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18784718 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | LEE, WILLIAM Y | 1623 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 10d overdue | Pending | Jul 25, 2024 |
| 18763381 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION AND DELIVERY DEVICE THEREOF | KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN | 3781 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
| 17894885 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | LEE, WILLIAM Y | 1623 | §103DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 24, 2022 |
| 17894884 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | LEE, WILLIAM Y | 1623 | §103Other | Final Rejection | 55d | Pending | Aug 24, 2022 |
| 17784841 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING D2O | KENYON, JOHN S | 1625 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 1d overdue | Pending | Jun 13, 2022 |
| 17721831 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | TRAN, ERIC | 1629 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Apr 15, 2022 |
| 17681560 | OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION | SIMMONS, CHRIS E | 1622 | §103Other | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | Feb 25, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial