Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Synexis LLC is currently addressing 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's filings are diverse enough to trigger reviews from different specialized groups within the patent office. The presence of 2 pending office actions indicates an active, albeit small, prosecution cycle. Because the company is working within 2 distinct art units, the technical requirements and prior art landscapes may vary significantly between the two matters.
CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 of the 2 pending office actions under their review. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending actions, there is no overlap in the personnel or the administrative units reviewing the company's work. This requires a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the different expectations of multiple examiners in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Each action must be handled as a unique case with no examiner or art unit overlap to provide consistency in the review process. The company's success depends on navigating the specific preferences of both distinct examiners, including CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT, across these separate administrative divisions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT | 1 | 70.6% | +11.6% |
| RIPA, BRYAN D | 1 | 53.9% | +37.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18636748 | PURIFIED HYDROGEN PEROXIDE GAS MICROBIAL CONTROL METHODS AND DEVICES | CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18636748 | PURIFIED HYDROGEN PEROXIDE GAS MICROBIAL CONTROL METHODS AND DEVICES | CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT | — |
| 17996179 | ALTERNATING CURRENT ELECTROCATALYTIC DRY HYDROGEN PEROXIDE GENERATING DEVICES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | RIPA, BRYAN D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1799 | 1 |
| 1794 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18636748 | PURIFIED HYDROGEN PEROXIDE GAS MICROBIAL CONTROL METHODS AND DEVICES | CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT | 1799 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 16, 2024 |
| 17996179 | ALTERNATING CURRENT ELECTROCATALYTIC DRY HYDROGEN PEROXIDE GENERATING DEVICES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | RIPA, BRYAN D | 1794 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 13, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial