Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
T-Global Technology Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and multiple art units. This distribution between actions and examiners means that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual, preventing any consolidation of prosecution strategy under a single examiner.
LEE, DANIEL H. is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Since the total number of actions is spread across multiple examiners, the workload is balanced. Practitioners must navigate different art units, which may result in different procedural requirements or prior art focuses for each of the pending applications. This distribution requires the legal team to manage separate examination tracks simultaneously.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, DANIEL H. | 1 | 70.6% | +25.3% |
| CASERTO, JULIA SHARON | 1 | 71.4% | +28.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17831121 | Multi-layered thermal interface material structure, manufacturing method thereof, and battery device having the same | CASERTO, JULIA SHARON | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17831121 | Multi-layered thermal interface material structure, manufacturing method thereof, and battery device having the same | CASERTO, JULIA SHARON | 26d |
| 18269063 | Thermal Managing Method | LEE, DANIEL H. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 1 |
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18269063 | Thermal Managing Method | LEE, DANIEL H. | 1746 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 22, 2023 |
| 17831121 | Multi-layered thermal interface material structure, manufacturing method thereof, and battery device having the same | CASERTO, JULIA SHARON | 1789 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 26d | Pending | Jun 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial