Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Taal Dit GmbH is currently navigating the prosecution of 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the current interaction with the patent office. Furthermore, the portfolio's active matters are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly focused prosecution effort without the complexity of managing multiple administrative divisions or varying examiner preferences.
The busiest examiner identified for this portfolio is DE LA GARZA, CARLOS HEBERTO, who is assigned to 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending action in total, DE LA GARZA, CARLOS HEBERTO is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending workload. This direct relationship between the examiner's pending count and the total portfolio pending count simplifies the communication strategy for the applicant. Practitioners can focus their resources on the specific requirements and historical tendencies of this single examiner within the designated art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE LA GARZA, CARLOS HEBERTO | 1 | 68.4% | +42.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17915026 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS | DE LA GARZA, CARLOS HEBERTO | 19d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17915026 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS | DE LA GARZA, CARLOS HEBERTO | 19d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2182 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17915026 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS | DE LA GARZA, CARLOS HEBERTO | 2182 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 19d | Pending | Sep 27, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial