Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Taieisangyo Co. Ltd. maintains a highly concentrated patent portfolio within the Communications technology area. Currently, the company has 1 pending office action across its entire filing set. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a very narrow and focused interaction with the patent office at this stage. The prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, suggesting that the underlying technology is specialized or fits within a specific regulatory classification.
NGUYEN, SEAN H is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This individual is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action, representing the entirety of the company's current workload. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit simplifies the logistical burden of monitoring multiple examiner behaviors or art unit trends. This concentration allows for a deep dive into the specific preferences and history of the 1 distinct examiner involved.
For practitioners, this data shows a singular point of contact within the patent office. The presence of 1 pending office action means that the prosecution strategy is currently focused on a single application or a very small group of related filings. The 1 distinct art unit also provides a stable procedural environment for the pending case. This focused approach is characteristic of portfolios with a single active case, allowing for maximum attention to the nuances of the pending action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, SEAN H | 1 | 86.5% | +4.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18833284 | CONVERSATION ASSISTANCE DEVICE | NGUYEN, SEAN H | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18833284 | CONVERSATION ASSISTANCE DEVICE | NGUYEN, SEAN H | 2691 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 04, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTaieisangyo Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Sean H Nguyen has the most, with 1 of Taieisangyo Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
