Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tailorbird Inc. is active in the Communications technology area with a very concentrated prosecution profile. The company has 1 pending office action currently under review by the patent office. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which means the applicant is dealing with a single set of examiner preferences and requirements. The portfolio is also limited to 1 distinct art unit, showing that the pending technology is classified within a single specialized area of the office rather than being spread across multiple technical fields.
The busiest examiner for Tailorbird Inc. is BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for the 1 pending office action, the company's entire active prosecution pipeline is managed by this one individual. This concentration under 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit indicates a highly focused legal effort. Practitioners should note that the success of the current application relies on navigating the specific standards of this single examiner, as there are no other active cases to provide broader context for the company's patent strategy. Managing active filings with 1 distinct examiner allows for a highly tailored approach to the prosecution process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY | 1 | 80.0% | +33.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17802873 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONVERTING DIGITAL IMAGES TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONSTRUCTION IMAGES | BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17802873 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONVERTING DIGITAL IMAGES TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONSTRUCTION IMAGES | BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2673 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17802873 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONVERTING DIGITAL IMAGES TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONSTRUCTION IMAGES | BONANSINGA, AARON TIMOTHY | 2673 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Aug 26, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial