Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Takaya Technology Inc. currently faces 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. Such a limited number of pending actions indicates a specific or early-stage prosecution phase for the company's current mechanical engineering interests. This focused interaction allows the applicant to concentrate resources on a single set of examiner requirements and art unit guidelines.
The busiest examiner assigned to the portfolio is STUART, COLIN W, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is the sole point of contact for the company's current pending matters. The prosecution strategy is therefore dependent on the specific standards and interpretations of this 1 distinct art unit and the assigned examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific technical nuances relevant to this examiner to resolve the 1 pending office action effectively.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STUART, COLIN W | 1 | 57.9% | +55.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18213568 | RESPIRATOR | STUART, COLIN W | 49d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18213568 | RESPIRATOR | STUART, COLIN W | 49d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3785 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18213568 | RESPIRATOR | STUART, COLIN W | 3785 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 49d overdue | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial