Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Takler S R L currently has 2 pending office actions. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that the company is interacting with multiple reviewers simultaneously.
The portfolio is active across 1 distinct art unit. BENDEL, CARSON JEAN is the busiest examiner, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This indicates that the 2 pending office actions are split between 2 distinct examiners within the same art unit.
For practitioners, this concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific technical or administrative focus. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the prosecution of the 2 pending office actions must be tailored to different individual requirements. The role of BENDEL, CARSON JEAN as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action confirms this balanced workload among the 2 distinct examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENDEL, CARSON JEAN | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| NEYZARI, OMID | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35522927 | Platform enclosure for elevators and hoists | BENDEL, CARSON JEAN | 77d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18830042 | LADDER FOR VEHICLES AND RELATED ASSEMBLY METHOD | NEYZARI, OMID | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2964 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35522927 | Platform enclosure for elevators and hoists | BENDEL, CARSON JEAN | 2964 | §112 | Final Rejection | 77d overdue | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
| 18830042 | LADDER FOR VEHICLES AND RELATED ASSEMBLY METHOD | NEYZARI, OMID | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial