Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Takraf GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Takraf GmbH maintains a company patent portfolio that currently includes 1 pending office action. This matter is situated within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus suggests that the company's current patent activity is confined to a specific technical niche.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending action in total, this examiner manages the entire active workload for the company. This allows the applicant to tailor their prosecution strategy to the specific historical patterns and preferences of DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS.

With 1 distinct art unit involved, the technical scope of the pending work is localized within one specialized group at the USPTO. The 1 pending office action represents the current administrative requirement for the portfolio. Practitioners can expect a streamlined communication process given that only 1 distinct examiner is involved in the current prosecution cycle.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS 1 33.3% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18728552 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SHREDDING OBJECTS DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3725 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18728552 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SHREDDING OBJECTS DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS 3725 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2024

Managing Takraf GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month