Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Tama Group

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (33%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
No statute on record1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ACKUN, JACOB K 1 56.5% +2.3%
TECCO, ANDREW M 1 65.1% +25.0%
GUGLIOTTA, NICOLE T 1 53.0% +2.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18697167 Methods of Using Wrapping Material to Wrap An Agricultural Product TECCO, ANDREW M 9d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3736 1
3731 1
1781 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19027810 WRAPPING MATERIAL FOR REDUCED CONTAMINATION ACKUN, JACOB K 3736 Other Final Rejection Pending Jan 17, 2025
18697167 Methods of Using Wrapping Material to Wrap An Agricultural Product TECCO, ANDREW M 3731 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Mar 29, 2024
18122282 BREATHABLE FILM GUGLIOTTA, NICOLE T 1781 §103 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Mar 16, 2023

Managing Tama Group's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month