Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
T&T Consulting And Engineering Inc. is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area with 1 pending office action. This prosecution task is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. The limited volume of pending actions suggests a highly focused or early-stage prosecution phase for the current portfolio. All active efforts are currently directed toward a single application in this technological sector.
JONATHAN G RILEY serves as the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending office action in total, JONATHAN G RILEY is the sole point of contact for the company's current interactions with the patent office. This centralization means that the success of the pending application depends entirely on the specific requirements of this examiner and the 1 distinct art unit. No other examiners are currently reviewing the company's work.
Practitioners managing this portfolio must focus their efforts on the specific examination patterns of JONATHAN G RILEY. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, there is no opportunity to leverage insights from other units within the same technology area. The prosecution strategy is singular and direct, reflecting the current 1-to-1 relationship between the action and the examiner. Success in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field currently relies on navigating the specific requirements of this single examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RILEY, JONATHAN G | 1 | 52.2% | +30.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19060205 | HIGH VOLUME SCORING SYSTEM FOR BREAD DOUGH | RILEY, JONATHAN G | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19060205 | HIGH VOLUME SCORING SYSTEM FOR BREAD DOUGH | RILEY, JONATHAN G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3724 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19060205 | HIGH VOLUME SCORING SYSTEM FOR BREAD DOUGH | RILEY, JONATHAN G | 3724 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 21, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialT&T Consulting And Engineering Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jonathan G Riley has the most, with 1 of T&T Consulting And Engineering Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
