Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tangoe US Inc. is currently handling 4 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the company's innovations are being evaluated by several different technical teams within the patent office. This spread across 3 distinct art units suggests a diverse range of networking and security technologies that require specialized review from multiple examination groups. The presence of 4 pending office actions shows a moderate level of current activity in this technical sector.
CHOU, ALAN S is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently under review. The portfolio is characterized by a high degree of examiner diversity, as there are 4 distinct examiners for the 4 pending office actions. This 1 to 1 ratio of examiners to actions means that no single individual has a concentrated influence over the company's pending applications. By interacting with 4 distinct examiners, the company is exposed to a variety of examination styles and interpretations of patentability within the networking and security field across 3 distinct art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOU, ALAN S | 1 | 75.4% | +14.0% |
| DEBROW, JAMES J | 1 | 70.0% | +25.7% |
| ANYA, CHARLES E | 1 | 81.7% | +32.9% |
| KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 1 | 31.8% | +46.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18459235 | System and Method Of Annotating Data Models Allowing The Factoring In Or Out Of Recurring Events To Improve The Outcome Of Predictive Systems | ANYA, CHARLES E | 52d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18324076 | Automatic Normalization for Service Level Agreement Monitoring and Conformance Engine | KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 20d |
| 18964975 | Cloud Instantiation Based on Machine Learned Prediction | CHOU, ALAN S | — |
| 18884982 | Intelligent Automated Creation of Electronic Data Exchange Templates for Telecommunication Expense Management Inventory Processing | DEBROW, JAMES J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18459235 | System and Method Of Annotating Data Models Allowing The Factoring In Or Out Of Recurring Events To Improve The Outcome Of Predictive Systems | ANYA, CHARLES E | 52d overdue |
| 18324076 | Automatic Normalization for Service Level Agreement Monitoring and Conformance Engine | KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 20d |
| 18964975 | Cloud Instantiation Based on Machine Learned Prediction | CHOU, ALAN S | — |
| 18884982 | Intelligent Automated Creation of Electronic Data Exchange Templates for Telecommunication Expense Management Inventory Processing | DEBROW, JAMES J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2451 | 1 |
| 2194 | 1 |
| 3626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18964975 | Cloud Instantiation Based on Machine Learned Prediction | CHOU, ALAN S | 2451 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 02, 2024 |
| 18884982 | Intelligent Automated Creation of Electronic Data Exchange Templates for Telecommunication Expense Management Inventory Processing | DEBROW, JAMES J | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 13, 2024 |
| 18459235 | System and Method Of Annotating Data Models Allowing The Factoring In Or Out Of Recurring Events To Improve The Outcome Of Predictive Systems | ANYA, CHARLES E | 2194 | §103 | Final Rejection | 52d overdue | Pending | Aug 31, 2023 |
| 18324076 | Automatic Normalization for Service Level Agreement Monitoring and Conformance Engine | KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 3626 | §101 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | May 25, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial