Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Tarkett Gdl

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Tarkett Gdl currently manages 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's current patent filings cover different technical aspects within the broader mechanical field. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, with each examiner handling a separate case.

MUDD, HENRY HOOPER is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. For a practitioner, the distribution of 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners means there is no administrative or technical overlap in the current workload. MUDD, HENRY HOOPER is the point of contact for 1 of the cases, while the other is being reviewed by a different individual in a separate art unit.

This decentralized structure requires the company to manage two independent prosecution paths. The lack of overlap between the 2 distinct art units suggests that the legal strategy must be tailored to the specific standards of each group. MUDD, HENRY HOOPER and the other assigned examiner will each provide independent feedback, necessitating a versatile approach to the company's intellectual property negotiations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MUDD, HENRY HOOPER 1 70.0% +24.5%
KRUER, KEVIN R 1 26.6% +29.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19107339 FLOORING TILE WITH INTERLOCKING CONNECTORS MUDD, HENRY HOOPER —
18704674 PVC-BASED MULTILAYER SURFACE COVERING WITH PVOH BARRIER KRUER, KEVIN R —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19107339 FLOORING TILE WITH INTERLOCKING CONNECTORS MUDD, HENRY HOOPER —
18704674 PVC-BASED MULTILAYER SURFACE COVERING WITH PVOH BARRIER KRUER, KEVIN R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3642 1
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19107339 FLOORING TILE WITH INTERLOCKING CONNECTORS MUDD, HENRY HOOPER 3642 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
18704674 PVC-BASED MULTILAYER SURFACE COVERING WITH PVOH BARRIER KRUER, KEVIN R 1787 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 25, 2024

Managing Tarkett Gdl's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Tarkett Gdl have?

Tarkett Gdl has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Tarkett Gdl applications?

Henry Hooper Mudd has the most, with 1 of Tarkett Gdl's pending office actions.

What technology area are Tarkett Gdl's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month