Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Tatari Inc. manages a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that each examiner is managing 1 pending action for the company. The prosecution is spread across 2 distinct art units, matching the number of distinct examiners.
OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF is the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending office action. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the 2 pending office actions involve different technical sub-fields within the mechanical systems sector. With 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is distributed such that each of the 2 distinct examiners is assigned to 1 pending office action. This decentralized approach ensures that each of the 2 pending office actions receives a dedicated review from a different examiner in a different art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 1 | 16.2% | +14.1% |
| PATEL, DIPEN M | 1 | 20.1% | +23.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18395044 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MEDIA CREATIVE ATTRIBUTION FOR APPLICATION DOWNLOAD OR INSTALLATION | OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 49d overdue |
| 18069756 | SELF-CONSISTENT INCEPTION ARCHITECTURE FOR EFFICIENT BASELINING MEDIA CREATIVES | PATEL, DIPEN M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18395044 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MEDIA CREATIVE ATTRIBUTION FOR APPLICATION DOWNLOAD OR INSTALLATION | OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 49d overdue |
| 18069756 | SELF-CONSISTENT INCEPTION ARCHITECTURE FOR EFFICIENT BASELINING MEDIA CREATIVES | PATEL, DIPEN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3622 | 1 |
| 3621 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18395044 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MEDIA CREATIVE ATTRIBUTION FOR APPLICATION DOWNLOAD OR INSTALLATION | OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 3622 | §101 | Final Rejection | 49d overdue | Pending | Dec 22, 2023 |
| 18069756 | SELF-CONSISTENT INCEPTION ARCHITECTURE FOR EFFICIENT BASELINING MEDIA CREATIVES | PATEL, DIPEN M | 3621 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 21, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial