Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Td Ip Holdco LLC maintains a presence in the Communications technology area with 1 pending office action currently active. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a focused prosecution effort. The matter is being handled within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specific technical focus for the company's current filing.
RUSHING, MARK S is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the prosecution involves only 1 distinct examiner, the strategy must be closely aligned with the specific requirements of RUSHING, MARK S. Practitioners should focus on the examination tendencies within the 1 distinct art unit to advance the 1 pending office action. This concentration allows for a very targeted legal approach to resolve the company's current workload.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHING, MARK S | 1 | 76.7% | +23.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18211405 | DOOR MONITORING SYSTEM | RUSHING, MARK S | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2689 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18211405 | DOOR MONITORING SYSTEM | RUSHING, MARK S | 2689 | §103 | Final Rejection | 16d | Pending | Jun 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial