Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

TDW Delaware Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

TDW Delaware Inc. is managing 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that each case is evaluated independently by a different official. The portfolio is distributed across 2 distinct art units, suggesting some technical variety within the company's mechanical systems filings and a broader reach across different patent office classifications.

Fannie C Kee is the busiest examiner, currently responsible for 1 pending action. With 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the company must manage multiple prosecution tracks simultaneously, each with its own set of examiner preferences. The involvement of 2 art units indicates that the subject matter spans different technical classifications, requiring a flexible approach to patent office interactions that can adapt to the varying standards of each unit.

The distribution of 3 pending actions among 3 distinct examiners reduces the risk of the entire portfolio being affected by a single official's decision. However, the presence of 2 distinct art units means that practitioners must be prepared for different technical prior art to be cited against the company's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems innovations. Successfully navigating this portfolio requires a coordinated effort to address the specific feedback from Fannie C Kee and the other examiners while maintaining a cohesive overall strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEE, FANNIE C 1 69.9% +29.2%
BOCHNA, DAVID 1 79.8% +13.6%
LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18492531 Isolation Plug With Energized Seal LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS 26d
19065355 Two Piece Large Pipe Quick Connect KEE, FANNIE C —
18412861 Pressure-Responsive, Deformable, Self-Integrating Pigging Element For Use In Pipeline Pigging Applications BOCHNA, DAVID —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19065355 Two Piece Large Pipe Quick Connect KEE, FANNIE C —
18412861 Pressure-Responsive, Deformable, Self-Integrating Pigging Element For Use In Pipeline Pigging Applications BOCHNA, DAVID —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3679 2
3753 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19065355 Two Piece Large Pipe Quick Connect KEE, FANNIE C 3679 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
18412861 Pressure-Responsive, Deformable, Self-Integrating Pigging Element For Use In Pipeline Pigging Applications BOCHNA, DAVID 3679 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2024
18492531 Isolation Plug With Energized Seal LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS 3753 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Oct 23, 2023

Managing TDW Delaware Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month