Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Team Wildfire Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being processed by a distinct examiner in a distinct art unit. SARA GRACE BROWN is the busiest examiner for the company, currently responsible for the 1 pending office action identified in the portfolio data. This indicates a very narrow and specific prosecution focus for the company at this time.
The company's current activity is limited to 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. SARA GRACE BROWN serves as the primary examiner, and the matter is being handled within a distinct art unit. This concentrated prosecution profile suggests that the company is not currently managing a broad array of concurrent patent applications. By focusing on the assigned examiner and a distinct art unit, the company can ensure that its prosecution strategy is perfectly aligned with the technical requirements and examiner expectations for this specific matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, SARA GRACE | 1 | 29.2% | +33.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18630213 | AI-BASED ALLOCATION OF WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT RESOURCES | BROWN, SARA GRACE | 63d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18630213 | AI-BASED ALLOCATION OF WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT RESOURCES | BROWN, SARA GRACE | 63d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18630213 | AI-BASED ALLOCATION OF WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT RESOURCES | BROWN, SARA GRACE | 3625 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 63d | Pending | Apr 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial