Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Team Worldwide Corporation

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Team Worldwide Corporation has 6 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 5 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units, so the pending workload spans several examination assignments, with some examiner and art unit coverage extending across more than one matter.

CONLEY, FREDRICK C is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. This is the only examiner-specific concentration identified in the record. Counsel should prioritize consistency across those matters while maintaining separate analysis for the other examiner and art unit assignments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONLEY, FREDRICK C 2 70.6% +12.8%
GABLER, PHILIP F 1 72.9% +23.2%
DAVIS, RICHARD G 1 80.5% +17.9%
HARE, DAVID R 1 67.7% +32.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18739460 INFLATABLE WATERCRAFT DAVIS, RICHARD G —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18458974 Inflatable Product CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18739487 Inflatable Product HARE, DAVID R 75d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18458974 Inflatable Product CONLEY, FREDRICK C 34d
18739487 Inflatable Product HARE, DAVID R 75d
18740709 INFLATABLE RECLINER GABLER, PHILIP F —
18739460 INFLATABLE WATERCRAFT DAVIS, RICHARD G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3679 2
3636 1
3644 1
3673 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18740709 INFLATABLE RECLINER GABLER, PHILIP F 3636 §102§103DP Final Rejection — Pending Jun 12, 2024
18739460 INFLATABLE WATERCRAFT DAVIS, RICHARD G 3644 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18739487 Inflatable Product HARE, DAVID R 3673 §102§103 Final Rejection 75d Pending Jun 11, 2024
18647639 INFLATABLE PRODUCT CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §102§103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Apr 26, 2024
18458974 Inflatable Product CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §102§103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Aug 30, 2023

Managing Team Worldwide Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Team Worldwide Corporation have?

Team Worldwide Corporation has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Team Worldwide Corporation applications?

Fredrick C Conley has the most, with 2 of Team Worldwide Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Team Worldwide Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month