Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Teamstack AI Corp. maintains a presence in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action, which serves as the focus of its ongoing patent prosecution efforts. This action indicates that the company is in the process of resolving specific examiner concerns for its technical filings.
The administrative profile of the portfolio is streamlined, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This structure implies that the company's current intellectual property pursuits are concentrated within a specific technical niche of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The use of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the examination process is governed by a consistent set of internal guidelines and technical expertise.
GUILIANO, CHARLES A is the busiest examiner for Teamstack AI Corp., with 1 pending office action currently under review. Because this examiner is assigned to the company's active cases, the progress of the portfolio is linked to this individual's examination pace and requirements. Monitoring the 1 pending action handled by GUILIANO, CHARLES A is essential for understanding the current trajectory of the company's patenting strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 1 | 37.5% | +37.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18123761 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATION OF PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELATED DATA VISUALIZATION | GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18123761 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATION OF PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELATED DATA VISUALIZATION | GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18123761 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATION OF PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELATED DATA VISUALIZATION | GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 3623 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Mar 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial