Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Techifab GmbH

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Techifab GmbH manages 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, accounting for a portion of the company's pending files. For a practitioner, the distribution of 2 pending office actions across 2 examiners means that each case is being handled independently.

The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's technology may involve different semiconductor or optical sub-specialties. This requires the practitioner to monitor 2 separate examination tracks simultaneously. Practitioners should monitor the feedback from the 2 examiners to identify any common themes or divergent requirements. Because the workload is split between 2 distinct art units, the legal team must ensure that the technical disclosures are interpreted consistently. This profile represents a balanced approach to prosecution where no 1 examiner or art unit dominates the company's current pending interests in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH 1 72.3% +18.4%
OTT, PATRICK S 1 68.0% +23.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18541027 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SPUTTERING AT LEAST TWO ELEMENTS OTT, PATRICK S 33d
18840946 MEMRISTIVE STRUCTURE, MEMRISTIVE ARRAY, AND METHODS THEREOF SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18541027 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SPUTTERING AT LEAST TWO ELEMENTS OTT, PATRICK S 33d
18840946 MEMRISTIVE STRUCTURE, MEMRISTIVE ARRAY, AND METHODS THEREOF SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2893 1
1794 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18840946 MEMRISTIVE STRUCTURE, MEMRISTIVE ARRAY, AND METHODS THEREOF SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH 2893 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18541027 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SPUTTERING AT LEAST TWO ELEMENTS OTT, PATRICK S 1794 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 33d Pending Dec 15, 2023

Managing Techifab GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Techifab GmbH have?

Techifab GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Techifab GmbH applications?

Vongsavanh Sengdara has the most, with 1 of Techifab GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Techifab GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month