Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Techni-Modul Engineering is managing 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution landscape for this company is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This level of concentration suggests that the company's current patent filings fall within a technical category handled by a group of examiners at the patent office. The 1 pending office action represents the current workload for the portfolio.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there is 1 distinct examiner involved, the 1 pending office action is subject to the specific standards of this individual. The alignment of the portfolio within 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution strategy can be tailored to the procedural norms of that division. The 1 busiest examiner pending office action matches the 1 pending office action currently reported.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | 1 | 66.3% | +13.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722311 | MULTI-BLOCKS STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING A COMPOSITE PART FROM SAID STRUCTURE | KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722311 | MULTI-BLOCKS STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING A COMPOSITE PART FROM SAID STRUCTURE | KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722311 | MULTI-BLOCKS STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING A COMPOSITE PART FROM SAID STRUCTURE | KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | 1784 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial