Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 1 of 1 (100%) have an AI response strategy ready
Technology Research Association For Future Additive Manufacturing operates a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company has 1 pending office action currently active. This indicates a focused effort to protect a specific chemical or material innovation through the patent office. The current level of activity suggests that the association is in a critical stage of securing rights for its core additive manufacturing technology.
The prosecution is handled by a distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's current filings fall within a specialized technical category. JEFFREY MICHAEL WOLLSCHLAGER is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing the busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is the only official currently reviewing the company's pending claims, which provides an opportunity for a consistent and focused technical dialogue.
For the legal team, the presence of the distinct art unit simplifies the procedural landscape. Because there is 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is entirely centered on the feedback from JEFFREY MICHAEL WOLLSCHLAGER. This allows for a concentrated response to any rejections within the Chemistry & Materials sector, ensuring that the technical arguments are specifically tailored to the examiner's requirements and the standards of the assigned art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL | 1 | 62.1% | +29.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17251719 | ARITHMETIC DEVICE, DETECTION SYSTEM, MODELING APPARATUS, ARITHMETIC METHOD, DETECTION METHOD, MODELING METHOD, ARITHMETIC PROGRAM, DETECTION PROGRAM, AND MODELING PROGRAM | WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL | 30d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17251719 | ARITHMETIC DEVICE, DETECTION SYSTEM, MODELING APPARATUS, ARITHMETIC METHOD, DETECTION METHOD, MODELING METHOD, ARITHMETIC PROGRAM, DETECTION PROGRAM, AND MODELING PROGRAM | WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1742 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17251719 | ARITHMETIC DEVICE, DETECTION SYSTEM, MODELING APPARATUS, ARITHMETIC METHOD, DETECTION METHOD, MODELING METHOD, ARITHMETIC PROGRAM, DETECTION PROGRAM, AND MODELING PROGRAM | WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL | 1742 | §102§103Other | Final Rejection | 30d | AI Ready | May 24, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTechnology Research Association For Future Additive Manufacturing has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jeffrey Michael Wollschlager has the most, with 1 of Technology Research Association For Future Additive Manufacturing's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
