Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Telecom Italia S.p.A.

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 24 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Telecom Italia S.p.A. has 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. The busiest examiner, LAMBERT, GABRIEL JOSEPH RENE, is responsible for 1 pending office action, which shows that the workload is evenly divided among the assigned staff. With 3 distinct art units involved for 3 pending office actions, the company's innovations are being reviewed in three different specialized contexts.

For practitioners, this means there is no overlap in the current prosecution environment that would allow for a single strategy. Each of the 3 pending office actions must be handled according to the specific preferences of the 3 distinct examiners. This distribution across 3 distinct art units suggests that Telecom Italia S.p.A. is pursuing a variety of technologies that fall into different patent office classifications within the mechanical systems sector. Since each of the 3 distinct examiners handles only 1 pending office action, there is no opportunity to leverage a relationship with a single examiner to resolve multiple actions. Each of the 3 pending office actions must be treated as an independent negotiation, requiring a customized strategy that addresses the specific technical and procedural requirements of each distinct art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (25%)
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIM, EUI H 1 48.5% +52.6%
LAMBERT, GABRIEL JOSEPH RENE 1 64.2% +12.8%
RAHMAN, SHAH M 1 81.0% +24.7%
BOND, REED MADISON 1 14.8% +37.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18033625 Method for Allocating Resources in a Geographic Area BOND, REED MADISON 7d
18714921 TRANSMISSION OF A MEASUREMENT RESULT THROUGH A PACKET-SWITCHED COMMUNICATION NETWORK RAHMAN, SHAH M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18033625 Method for Allocating Resources in a Geographic Area BOND, REED MADISON 7d
19110781 SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING NETWORK TRAFFIC KIM, EUI H —
18881788 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENHANCING ROBOT CAPABILITIES LAMBERT, GABRIEL JOSEPH RENE —
18714921 TRANSMISSION OF A MEASUREMENT RESULT THROUGH A PACKET-SWITCHED COMMUNICATION NETWORK RAHMAN, SHAH M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2453 1
3669 1
2413 1
3624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19110781 SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING NETWORK TRAFFIC KIM, EUI H 2453 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2025
18881788 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENHANCING ROBOT CAPABILITIES LAMBERT, GABRIEL JOSEPH RENE 3669 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 07, 2025
18714921 TRANSMISSION OF A MEASUREMENT RESULT THROUGH A PACKET-SWITCHED COMMUNICATION NETWORK RAHMAN, SHAH M 2413 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 30, 2024
18033625 Method for Allocating Resources in a Geographic Area BOND, REED MADISON 3624 §101 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Apr 25, 2023

Managing Telecom Italia S.p.A.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Telecom Italia S.p.A. have?

Telecom Italia S.p.A. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Telecom Italia S.p.A. applications?

Eui H Kim has the most, with 1 of Telecom Italia S.p.A.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Telecom Italia S.p.A.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month