Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Teleo LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units, representing a minimal and highly concentrated prosecution effort. The data showing 0 distinct art units suggests a very specific or unique classification for the pending application within the patent office's organizational structure.
LI, CE LI is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing the 1 pending office action that represents the total active volume for the organization's current patent applications. This examiner's workload accounts for the entirety of the company's pending matters, centralizing all current patent office communication through a single point of contact.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LI, CE LI | 1 | 71.6% | +14.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial