Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tenneco GmbH currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D. The data shows 0 distinct art units for this action, which may reflect a specific administrative status or a very narrow technical focus for this single filing.
KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. As the only examiner currently reviewing the company's work, he represents the sole point of contact for their current USPTO activity. This concentration simplifies the prosecution landscape, as the company only needs to address the specific concerns and feedback of this one examiner to move their pending matter forward. The presence of 0 distinct art units indicates a highly focused technical scope.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D | 1 | 31.0% | +46.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18876041 | MOTORCYCLE-TYPE VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR MOTORCYCLE, WITH A PARTICULATE FILTER | KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18876041 | MOTORCYCLE-TYPE VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR MOTORCYCLE, WITH A PARTICULATE FILTER | KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18876041 | MOTORCYCLE-TYPE VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR MOTORCYCLE, WITH A PARTICULATE FILTER | KOPPIKAR, VIVEK D | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial