Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Tente GmbH & Co. Kg

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Tente GmbH & Co. Kg currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's prosecution activity is restricted to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a specific point of engagement with the patent office. This concentration implies that the company's current patenting efforts are focused on a particular mechanical or system-based innovation rather than a wide range of technologies. This focus can help in developing a deep understanding of the prior art cited by the unit.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is WILLIAMS, THOMAS J, who is assigned 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since this is the only pending action for the company, the progress of their Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems filings rests with this examiner's evaluation. The singular nature of this interaction means that the company's immediate prosecution results will be defined by the dialogue between the applicant and the examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WILLIAMS, THOMAS J 1 78.7% +14.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18288419 CONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CASTERS ATTACHED TO A MOVABLE PART WILLIAMS, THOMAS J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3616 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18288419 CONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CASTERS ATTACHED TO A MOVABLE PART WILLIAMS, THOMAS J 3616 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 26, 2023

Managing Tente GmbH & Co. Kg's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month