Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Tenza Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Tenza Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's research spans different specialized fields within the life sciences. The involvement of multiple distinct examiners indicates that each pending matter is being reviewed independently by a different official. This distribution requires the applicant to maintain a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the specific requirements of multiple examining groups.

The busiest examiner, GROOMS, TIFFANY NICOLE, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Given the total of 2 pending office actions, the workload is divided between the examiners. This distribution means that Tenza Inc. must navigate different sets of examiner expectations and multiple art unit cultures simultaneously. Practitioners should be prepared for varied feedback, as the assigned officials may prioritize different aspects of patentability within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.

The presence of 2 distinct art units may require the applicant to employ different technical arguments for each case. Because there is no single point of contact for the portfolio's active matters, the strategy for responding to office actions must be tailored to the specific preferences of each individual. This level of examiner diversity provides multiple opportunities for the applicant to secure patent protection through different channels. Successfully navigating these distinct art units will be essential for the continued growth of the portfolio in the life sciences field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GROOMS, TIFFANY NICOLE 1 57.8% +46.3%
JOHANSEN, PETER N. 1 59.3% +24.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17904038 BIO-THERAPEUTICS FOR DETECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH MUCOSAL BLEEDING JOHANSEN, PETER N. 21d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17904038 BIO-THERAPEUTICS FOR DETECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH MUCOSAL BLEEDING JOHANSEN, PETER N. 21d
18281388 SYNTHETIC PRE-PROTEIN SIGNAL PEPTIDES FOR DIRECTING SECRETION OF HETEROLOGOUS PROTEINS IN BACILLUS BACTERIA GROOMS, TIFFANY NICOLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1658 1
1644 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18281388 SYNTHETIC PRE-PROTEIN SIGNAL PEPTIDES FOR DIRECTING SECRETION OF HETEROLOGOUS PROTEINS IN BACILLUS BACTERIA GROOMS, TIFFANY NICOLE 1658 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2023
17904038 BIO-THERAPEUTICS FOR DETECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH MUCOSAL BLEEDING JOHANSEN, PETER N. 1644 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Aug 11, 2022

Managing Tenza Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month