Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Teradar Inc. has 3 pending office actions focused in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are handled by 3 distinct examiners, which means each examiner is responsible for a pending action. This distribution of 3 distinct examiners suggests that the current workload is spread across the patent office staff. The applicant must navigate the individual examination styles of these 3 distinct examiners while maintaining a cohesive strategy for the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems portfolio.
The organization's pending matters are all contained within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates a specific technical focus for Teradar Inc., as the 3 pending office actions are being processed within the same administrative division. Thomas James Halloran is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action under his review. This 1 pending action represents a portion of the total workload within the single art unit.
Because multiple examiners are working within 1 distinct art unit, the company faces different perspectives from the same technical group. This scenario requires a prosecution approach that accounts for the specific internal practices of that art unit while addressing the individual preferences of Thomas James Halloran and the other examiners involved. Managing the 3 pending office actions requires consistency in technical arguments to ensure that responses in one case do not conflict with those in another within the same administrative group.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 1 | 50.0% | +0.0% |
| MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA | 1 | 72.3% | +27.2% |
| PERVIN, NUZHAT | 1 | 81.3% | +13.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18750741 | TECHNIQUES FOR ADAPTIVE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION ABOUT TARGET OBJECTS BASED ON SITUATIONAL AWARENESS DATA | PERVIN, NUZHAT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19004134 | TERAHERTZ SENSORS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA | — |
| 18750741 | TECHNIQUES FOR ADAPTIVE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION ABOUT TARGET OBJECTS BASED ON SITUATIONAL AWARENESS DATA | PERVIN, NUZHAT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3648 | 3 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19004097 | TERAHERTZ SENSORS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 3648 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 27, 2024 |
| 19004134 | TERAHERTZ SENSORS AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA | 3648 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 27, 2024 |
| 18750741 | TECHNIQUES FOR ADAPTIVE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION ABOUT TARGET OBJECTS BASED ON SITUATIONAL AWARENESS DATA | PERVIN, NUZHAT | 3648 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTeradar Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.
Thomas James Halloran has the most, with 1 of Teradar Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
