Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUONG, JOHNNYKHOI BAO | 1 | 66.1% | +30.0% |
| SHEN, QUN | 1 | 76.2% | +38.4% |
| BOLOGNA, DOMINIC JOSEPH | 1 | 84.3% | +11.2% |
| DIEP, DUY T | 1 | 29.2% | +6.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17827363 | Systems and Methods for Semi-Supervised Active Learning | DIEP, DUY T | 35d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18285193 | MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATIONS OF PLANTS | SHEN, QUN | 98d overdue |
| 18285168 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOIL MAPPING | DUONG, JOHNNYKHOI BAO | 79d overdue |
| 18268130 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING OF PLANTS | BOLOGNA, DOMINIC JOSEPH | 7d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2667 | 1 |
| 2662 | 1 |
| 2877 | 1 |
| 2123 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18285168 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOIL MAPPING | DUONG, JOHNNYKHOI BAO | 2667 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 79d overdue | Pending | Sep 29, 2023 |
| 18285193 | MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATIONS OF PLANTS | SHEN, QUN | 2662 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 98d overdue | Pending | Sep 29, 2023 |
| 18268130 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING OF PLANTS | BOLOGNA, DOMINIC JOSEPH | 2877 | Other | Final Rejection | 7d | Pending | Jun 16, 2023 |
| 17827363 | Systems and Methods for Semi-Supervised Active Learning | DIEP, DUY T | 2123 | §103 | Final Rejection | 35d overdue | Pending | May 27, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial