Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Terranet Tech AB has 1 pending office action currently active. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units. This profile shows a very limited engagement with the patent office, as all activity is concentrated under a single individual. The lack of a recorded art unit count for the 1 pending office action is a notable detail in the current data, though it does not change the focused nature of the prosecution.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. This indicates that all current patent office activity is concentrated under this single examiner, with no other staff members involved in reviewing the company's applications. Since the busiest examiner is only managing 1 pending office action, the portfolio is in a low-volume state. This centralized structure simplifies communication but places the outcome of the current prosecution entirely in the hands of this examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | 1 | 80.6% | +23.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692272 | FILTERING A STREAM OF EVENTS FROM AN EVENT-BASED SENSOR | BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692272 | FILTERING A STREAM OF EVENTS FROM AN EVENT-BASED SENSOR | BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18692272 | FILTERING A STREAM OF EVENTS FROM AN EVENT-BASED SENSOR | BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial