Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Tesla Biohealing Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Tesla Biohealing Inc. maintains an active patent prosecution profile within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company currently has 4 pending office actions, which are distributed across 3 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's biotechnology innovations are being reviewed by several different specialized groups within the USPTO, reflecting a range of technical applications. The use of 3 distinct art units requires the company to adapt its legal and technical arguments to the specific standards of three different examination groups.

The prosecution workload is managed by 3 distinct examiners, with GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A serving as the busiest examiner. GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A is responsible for 2 busiest examiner pending office actions, while the remaining 2 pending office actions are split between the other distinct examiners. This provides some variety in examination styles across the portfolio. Managing 4 pending office actions across 3 distinct art units requires a coordinated strategy to ensure consistency in the company's intellectual property filings.

Practitioners must address the specific requirements of GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A for a portion of the matters while simultaneously navigating the preferences of the other 2 distinct examiners. This structure allows the company to advance multiple patent goals within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector while focusing a significant portion of its efforts on a single examiner's feedback. The 2 busiest examiner pending for GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A highlights a point of consolidation in an otherwise distributed prosecution environment. This distribution among 3 distinct art units provides the company with a broad exposure to various USPTO examination practices.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (80%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Double-patenting only1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 2 36.0% +34.9%
ARNOLD, ERNST V 1 48.2% +12.8%
TRUONG, QUANGLONG N 1 78.6% +23.3%
MONSHIPOURI, MARYAM 1 79.2% +37.2%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17409665 Bioenergy (Biophoton) Generator and Its Use MONSHIPOURI, MARYAM 23d
18780610 Devices for Treating Diseases and Conditions ARNOLD, ERNST V —
18735463 BIOENERGY (BIOPHOTON) GENERATOR AND ITS USE TRUONG, QUANGLONG N —
18380727 Bioenergy (Biophoton) Generator and its Use GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A —
18374040 A Bioenergy (Biophoton) Generator and its Use GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1759 2
1613 1
1615 1
1651 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18780610 Devices for Treating Diseases and Conditions ARNOLD, ERNST V 1613 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2024
18735463 BIOENERGY (BIOPHOTON) GENERATOR AND ITS USE TRUONG, QUANGLONG N 1615 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2024
18380727 Bioenergy (Biophoton) Generator and its Use GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 1759 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2023
18374040 A Bioenergy (Biophoton) Generator and its Use GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 1759 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 28, 2023
17409665 Bioenergy (Biophoton) Generator and Its Use MONSHIPOURI, MARYAM 1651 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Aug 23, 2021

Managing Tesla Biohealing Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Tesla Biohealing Inc. have?

Tesla Biohealing Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Tesla Biohealing Inc. applications?

Elizabeth A Gwartney has the most, with 2 of Tesla Biohealing Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Tesla Biohealing Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month