Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tevel Advanced Technologies Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single pending matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CASS, JEAN PAUL. The concentration of the portfolio is evident as all activity is contained within 1 distinct art unit. This organizational structure suggests a highly focused prosecution strategy in this specific technological field, as the company is not currently navigating multiple art units or examiner perspectives.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is CASS, JEAN PAUL, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This represents the entirety of the company's current pending workload at the office. The alignment of the distinct examiner with the distinct art unit for the pending office action reflects a consolidated approach to patent acquisition. For a practitioner, this means that the company's current success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector depends on the outcomes of this singular interaction. The lack of broader distribution across the patent office indicates that the company's current legal efforts are concentrated on a very specific set of technical claims.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASS, JEAN PAUL | 1 | 72.9% | +25.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18697535 | NOVEL TOWING SYSTEM AND METHOD | CASS, JEAN PAUL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3666 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18697535 | NOVEL TOWING SYSTEM AND METHOD | CASS, JEAN PAUL | 3666 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTevel Advanced Technologies Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jean Paul Cass has the most, with 1 of Tevel Advanced Technologies Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
