Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Texol S R L currently faces 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, with each examiner handling one case. The portfolio is also spread across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the pending matters involve different technical specializations within the medical and mechanical fields. This variety suggests that the company is pursuing protection for diverse innovations simultaneously.
WRIGHT, ALEXANDER SCOTT is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Given that there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is balanced equally between the 2 distinct examiners. This distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests that Texol S R L is pursuing patents in multiple sub-sectors of its primary technology area. The current prosecution profile shows no concentration in a single examiner or art unit, as every pending action is handled by a different individual in a different administrative group, requiring a versatile legal strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WRIGHT, ALEXANDER SCOTT | 1 | 73.8% | -1.1% |
| PIERCE, JEREMY R | 1 | 56.8% | +42.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18721724 | HEMP HURD-BASED NONWOVEN MATERIAL AND RELATED PRODUCTION METHOD | PIERCE, JEREMY R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3781 | 1 |
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18896236 | METHOD AND APPARATUS OF MANUFACTURING A MULTILAYER ABSORBING ELEMENT FOR SANITARY ARTICLES | WRIGHT, ALEXANDER SCOTT | 3781 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 25, 2024 |
| 18721724 | HEMP HURD-BASED NONWOVEN MATERIAL AND RELATED PRODUCTION METHOD | PIERCE, JEREMY R | 1789 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTexol S R L has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Alexander Scott Wright has the most, with 1 of Texol S R L's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
