Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

The Azek Group LLC

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHEN, VIVIAN 1 57.0% +29.2%
KHAN, TAHSEEN 1 61.4% +22.1%
LEYSON, JOSEPH S 1 65.7% +36.5%
LAUX, JESSICA L 1 54.7% +28.3%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18761066 POLYMERIC-BASED BUILDING MATERIALS KHAN, TAHSEEN 5d overdue
19347096 COMPOSITE BOARD INCLUDING CORE AND CAPSTOCK, AND ASSOCIATED METHOD CHEN, VIVIAN 3d overdue
18534038 STAIR SYSTEM LAUX, JESSICA L 33d
18537425 VARIEGATED POLYMER-BASED MATERIALS LEYSON, JOSEPH S 71d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1787 1
1781 1
1744 1
3635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19347096 COMPOSITE BOARD INCLUDING CORE AND CAPSTOCK, AND ASSOCIATED METHOD CHEN, VIVIAN 1787 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Oct 01, 2025
18761066 POLYMERIC-BASED BUILDING MATERIALS KHAN, TAHSEEN 1781 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Jul 01, 2024
18537425 VARIEGATED POLYMER-BASED MATERIALS LEYSON, JOSEPH S 1744 §103 Final Rejection 71d Pending Dec 12, 2023
18534038 STAIR SYSTEM LAUX, JESSICA L 3635 Other Final Rejection 33d Pending Dec 08, 2023

Managing The Azek Group LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month