Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Boston Consulting Group Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Boston Consulting Group Inc. has 9 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Those matters span 9 examiners and 8 art units, so the portfolio is distributed across nearly as many examination assignments as actions.

ULLAH, ARIF is the busiest identified examiner, with 1 pending matter. No examiner holds a larger stated concentration, which means prosecution management should emphasize matter-by-matter coordination rather than a single examiner relationship.

The art-unit spread also calls for separate analysis of office-action patterns by assignment. Counsel can use that structure to organize response calendars, identify recurring claim issues within each unit, and avoid treating the docket as a uniform group.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (12%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (38%)
§101 + other3 (38%)
§103 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ULLAH, ARIF 1 48.1% +36.5%
OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 1 16.1% +13.9%
ZIMMERMAN, MATTHEW E 1 51.7% +46.2%
HOLZMACHER, DERICK J 1 44.4% +28.6%
MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 1 24.8% +25.0%
KANAAN, LIZA TONY 1 23.4% +31.5%
ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 1 29.2% +41.1%
HO, THOMAS Y 1 17.6% +29.0%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18615769 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING ITEM SUBSTITUTIONS ZIMMERMAN, MATTHEW E 58d overdue
18430096 Customer-Enabled Bank Platform For Use with Carbon Calculator MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 38d overdue
18420188 GENERATIVE AI SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS KANAAN, LIZA TONY 7d
17666320 OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT CONFIGURATION ENGINE IN A MATERIAL PROCESSING SYSTEM HO, THOMAS Y 27d
18758870 Computing Nodes for Performing Optimization Using Artificial Intelligence and Mixed Integer Programming OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 41d
18594815 Optimizing Cyber Security Projects HOLZMACHER, DERICK J —
17722225 MARKETING BUDGET ALLOCATION IN A DATA ANALYTICS SYSTEM ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18615769 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING ITEM SUBSTITUTIONS ZIMMERMAN, MATTHEW E 58d overdue
18430096 Customer-Enabled Bank Platform For Use with Carbon Calculator MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 38d overdue
18420188 GENERATIVE AI SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS KANAAN, LIZA TONY 7d
17666320 OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT CONFIGURATION ENGINE IN A MATERIAL PROCESSING SYSTEM HO, THOMAS Y 27d
18758870 Computing Nodes for Performing Optimization Using Artificial Intelligence and Mixed Integer Programming OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 41d
19079542 SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR OPTIMIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION OF POWER-TO-X PLANTS ULLAH, ARIF —
18594815 Optimizing Cyber Security Projects HOLZMACHER, DERICK J —
17722225 MARKETING BUDGET ALLOCATION IN A DATA ANALYTICS SYSTEM ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 2
3622 1
3688 1
3628 1
3683 1
3623 1
3624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19079542 SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR OPTIMIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION OF POWER-TO-X PLANTS ULLAH, ARIF 3625 DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2025
18758870 Computing Nodes for Performing Optimization Using Artificial Intelligence and Mixed Integer Programming OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 3622 §101 Final Rejection 41d Pending Jun 28, 2024
18615769 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING ITEM SUBSTITUTIONS ZIMMERMAN, MATTHEW E 3688 §101§103 Final Rejection 58d overdue Pending Mar 25, 2024
18594815 Optimizing Cyber Security Projects HOLZMACHER, DERICK J 3625 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2024
18430096 Customer-Enabled Bank Platform For Use with Carbon Calculator MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 3628 §101§103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Feb 01, 2024
18420188 GENERATIVE AI SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS KANAAN, LIZA TONY 3683 §101 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Jan 23, 2024
17722225 MARKETING BUDGET ALLOCATION IN A DATA ANALYTICS SYSTEM ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 3623 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 15, 2022
17666320 OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT CONFIGURATION ENGINE IN A MATERIAL PROCESSING SYSTEM HO, THOMAS Y 3624 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Feb 07, 2022

Managing The Boston Consulting Group Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The Boston Consulting Group Inc. have?

The Boston Consulting Group Inc. has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The Boston Consulting Group Inc. applications?

Arif Ullah has the most, with 1 of The Boston Consulting Group Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are The Boston Consulting Group Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month