Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

The Clean Plunger LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Clean Plunger LLC is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company has 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a singular point of prosecution. This concentration allows the company to dedicate its legal resources to a single examination process rather than managing multiple simultaneous reviews.

The matter is being reviewed in 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the technical innovations are being evaluated within a specific group. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific examination practices of this 1 unit. Understanding the specific internal policies of the department is critical for success in moving the application toward allowance.

DEERY, ERIN LEAH is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is responsible for the pending office action. The busiest examiner pending count is 1, confirming that this individual is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's pending work. The outcome of the current prosecution depends entirely on this specific interaction. Practitioners should analyze the historical patterns of the examiner to prepare an effective response.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DEERY, ERIN LEAH 1 58.3% +49.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19229730 Self-Cleaning Plunging Apparatus and Method of Use DEERY, ERIN LEAH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3754 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19229730 Self-Cleaning Plunging Apparatus and Method of Use DEERY, ERIN LEAH 3754 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 05, 2025

Managing The Clean Plunger LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month