Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 5 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research has 9 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The matters are assigned to 9 distinct examiners and 6 distinct art units. This distribution suggests that examiner coordination is as important as technical grouping in managing the docket.

EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The data show no concentration of multiple matters with a single examiner. Counsel should use a consistent device description and claim framework across the 6 art units, while preparing responses independently for each examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
12% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
88% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES 1 85.0% +15.5%
LONG, SARAH A 1 60.7% +42.4%
KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 1 78.0% +23.6%
SKROBARCZYK III, ROBERT ANTHONY 1 16.7% +16.3%
ANTHOPOLOS, PETER 1 57.4% +58.6%
HALL, DEANNA K 1 75.7% +15.3%
MARSH, OWEN LEWIS 1 66.7% +50.0%
TRAN, THIEN JASON 1 74.7% +18.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19002650 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCING BLEEDING VIA COORDINATED TRIGEMINAL AND VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18278688 NEURAL CONTROL OF ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY ANTHOPOLOS, PETER 14d
18927416 APPARATUS AND METHOD TO FACILITATE INTRODUCTION OF CERVICAL BALLOON CATHETER LONG, SARAH A —
18829209 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCING BLEEDING VIA ELECTRICAL TRIGEMINAL NERVE STIMULATION KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM —
18645129 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF STIMULATION AT TRIGEMINALLY INNERVATED REGIONS FOR DISORDERS OF CEREBRAL PERFUSION SKROBARCZYK III, ROBERT ANTHONY —
17194094 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING USER INTENTION FROM LIMB OR BODY MOTION OR TRAJECTORY TO CONTROL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMUATION OR PROSTHETIC DEVICE OPERATION MARSH, OWEN LEWIS —
18905283 A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SELECTIVE NERVE STIMULATION OF NEURAL TISSUE OF A SUBJECT TRAN, THIEN JASON —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18167475 MODULAR, PERCUTANEOUS DUAL-LUMEN CANNULA SYSTEM HALL, DEANNA K 5d
18278688 NEURAL CONTROL OF ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY ANTHOPOLOS, PETER 14d
19002650 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCING BLEEDING VIA COORDINATED TRIGEMINAL AND VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES —
18927416 APPARATUS AND METHOD TO FACILITATE INTRODUCTION OF CERVICAL BALLOON CATHETER LONG, SARAH A —
18829209 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCING BLEEDING VIA ELECTRICAL TRIGEMINAL NERVE STIMULATION KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM —
18645129 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF STIMULATION AT TRIGEMINALLY INNERVATED REGIONS FOR DISORDERS OF CEREBRAL PERFUSION SKROBARCZYK III, ROBERT ANTHONY —
17194094 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING USER INTENTION FROM LIMB OR BODY MOTION OR TRAJECTORY TO CONTROL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMUATION OR PROSTHETIC DEVICE OPERATION MARSH, OWEN LEWIS —
18905283 A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SELECTIVE NERVE STIMULATION OF NEURAL TISSUE OF A SUBJECT TRAN, THIEN JASON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 4
3771 1
1611 1
3783 1
3796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19002650 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCING BLEEDING VIA COORDINATED TRIGEMINAL AND VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES 3792 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18927416 APPARATUS AND METHOD TO FACILITATE INTRODUCTION OF CERVICAL BALLOON CATHETER LONG, SARAH A 3771 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18829209 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCING BLEEDING VIA ELECTRICAL TRIGEMINAL NERVE STIMULATION KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 3792 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18645129 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF STIMULATION AT TRIGEMINALLY INNERVATED REGIONS FOR DISORDERS OF CEREBRAL PERFUSION SKROBARCZYK III, ROBERT ANTHONY 3792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 24, 2024
18278688 NEURAL CONTROL OF ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY ANTHOPOLOS, PETER 1611 §102§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Aug 24, 2023
18167475 MODULAR, PERCUTANEOUS DUAL-LUMEN CANNULA SYSTEM HALL, DEANNA K 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Feb 10, 2023
17194094 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING USER INTENTION FROM LIMB OR BODY MOTION OR TRAJECTORY TO CONTROL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMUATION OR PROSTHETIC DEVICE OPERATION MARSH, OWEN LEWIS 3796 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 05, 2021
18905283 A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SELECTIVE NERVE STIMULATION OF NEURAL TISSUE OF A SUBJECT TRAN, THIEN JASON 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 03, 2024

Managing The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research have?

The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research applications?

Philip Charles Edwards has the most, with 1 of The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research's pending office actions.

What technology area are The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month